Showing posts with label Oscar-nominated. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oscar-nominated. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
#52 8½ (1963)
Federico Fellini.
This was the first time I ever saw this movie. And in 35mm in the theater, as well. I am so excited about this post and this movie, that every picture that I find on the internet I want to add to my post. I've restricted myself to only some of the best. Both movie posters I think are super cool. Then I have the two main actresses, Amouk Aimée, Guido's wife Luisa, and Claudia Cardinale, his muse Claudia. I also was extremely excited when I came across the animated gif of the dance scene with Mario and Gloria, which clearly was the inspiration for Tarantino's dance scene in Pulp Fiction with Travolta and Thurman, an obvious tribute to Fellini's 8½ if I ever saw one.
This movie is very difficult to write about, and I don't think I am going to try very much. I feel honestly blessed to have had the opportunity to see it in the theater even though it was a poor print and there was also a somewhat annoying older couple in the audience who laughed excessively during just about every scene. I think they were the kind of Seattlites who want to express to everybody how much they were understanding the movie by laughing at everything. You know, "we're so culturally aware and interesting. Not only do we go to 8½ in the theater, we want to make it clear that we know the film so much more than everybody else." To the point of at times repeating some phrase in italian that the character of the scene had just said with the air of like, "oh, how genius that is!" Regardless, it was impossible for me to come away from this film without thinking that it is truly one of the best films I have ever seen. And, I know that simply by its reputation as a film classic I was very hesitant to give it my approval. I guess I am very quick to think that movies are far too overrated. However, in this case, it was impossible not to adore this movie. I was completely enchanted by the actresses in this movie. Of course, the movie is about a film director struggling with his artistic voice and in particular with all the myriad women who occupy some part of his life. And Fellini does an incredible job of portraying them all. There is no way to watch this and not come away completely in love with women in all their incarnations. I was already so impressed with so many of the female characters already introduced at the point when Luisa, Guido's wife, shows up. Anouk Aimée instantly became one of my favorite actresses. And this was this first time I had ever seen her. The scene in which Guido sees her and follows her is incredible film-making at it's most basic. Her enchanting beauty and female strength was so immediately apparent to me, that I instantly fell in love with her. I was so entranced by Luisa and completely immersed by the movie that I couldn't have been rescued by anything that Fellini would do with it. And then he brought back into the picture Claudia. She had a very small shot early in the film that just gave you the idea she was going to be an insignificant extra in one of the strange dreams of Guido. But, no. He brought her back. And his portrayal of this sirena is too powerful to even try to describe in a silly blog. I only wish I could have seen the movie again immediately after it finished. Anyone who ever gets the opportunity to see this movie in the theater should legitimately feel great shame if they pass it up. I wish my meagre review could only portray a little bit how strongly I felt about this movie. 5 stars.
This movie is very difficult to write about, and I don't think I am going to try very much. I feel honestly blessed to have had the opportunity to see it in the theater even though it was a poor print and there was also a somewhat annoying older couple in the audience who laughed excessively during just about every scene. I think they were the kind of Seattlites who want to express to everybody how much they were understanding the movie by laughing at everything. You know, "we're so culturally aware and interesting. Not only do we go to 8½ in the theater, we want to make it clear that we know the film so much more than everybody else." To the point of at times repeating some phrase in italian that the character of the scene had just said with the air of like, "oh, how genius that is!" Regardless, it was impossible for me to come away from this film without thinking that it is truly one of the best films I have ever seen. And, I know that simply by its reputation as a film classic I was very hesitant to give it my approval. I guess I am very quick to think that movies are far too overrated. However, in this case, it was impossible not to adore this movie. I was completely enchanted by the actresses in this movie. Of course, the movie is about a film director struggling with his artistic voice and in particular with all the myriad women who occupy some part of his life. And Fellini does an incredible job of portraying them all. There is no way to watch this and not come away completely in love with women in all their incarnations. I was already so impressed with so many of the female characters already introduced at the point when Luisa, Guido's wife, shows up. Anouk Aimée instantly became one of my favorite actresses. And this was this first time I had ever seen her. The scene in which Guido sees her and follows her is incredible film-making at it's most basic. Her enchanting beauty and female strength was so immediately apparent to me, that I instantly fell in love with her. I was so entranced by Luisa and completely immersed by the movie that I couldn't have been rescued by anything that Fellini would do with it. And then he brought back into the picture Claudia. She had a very small shot early in the film that just gave you the idea she was going to be an insignificant extra in one of the strange dreams of Guido. But, no. He brought her back. And his portrayal of this sirena is too powerful to even try to describe in a silly blog. I only wish I could have seen the movie again immediately after it finished. Anyone who ever gets the opportunity to see this movie in the theater should legitimately feel great shame if they pass it up. I wish my meagre review could only portray a little bit how strongly I felt about this movie. 5 stars.
Saturday, February 16, 2013
#46 — #47 Oscar Nominated Shorts: Documentary (Part 2) (2012)
#46 Redemption — Jon Alpert & Matthew O'Neill
#47 Open Heart — Kief Davidson & Cori Shepherd Stern
This post gets a label of 5 stars primarily for this last film: Open Heart. I believe it will be the winner of the Oscar, and it deserves to be. It was a very touching story worth viewing for anybody. Even though it is only a short-length film and therefore harder to come-by, I recommend it over about 90% of the feature-length films I have on here.
Friday, February 15, 2013
#45 Zero Dark Thirty (2012)
Directed by Kathryn Bigelow. Written by Mark Boal.
SPOILER ALERT!!! We get Osama. (Or "UBL" as they like to refer to him in the movie.) I know I for one was sitting on the edge of my chair wondering. But yes, we do get him.
This movie was intense and forced you to pay attention almost to an extent that was tiring. However, it wasn't as smart of a movie as I had hoped. I very much dislike when "intelligence"-themed movies try to seem like they are smart by primarily making all the interactions slightly confusing. This movie was filled with a lot of jargon and incomplete conversations. I don't know if that sort of storyline makes other viewers think that they are using their brain a lot to follow the movie. For me, I really enjoy an "intelligence" movie when there is some actual intelligence involved in making the connections to either figure out whodunnit or find the bad guys. You know, where there's an actual point in the movie like a revelation, like, "wow, that took some smart thinking to figure that one out." Or, I don't know, at least used some sort of cool technology to outsmart the bad guys. There wasn't any moment like that in this movie. In fact, in many scenes I came away thinking how stupid the CIA was and how in reality they wouldn't have fucked it up like that at all. Namely, the upper al-Queda member who has been turned by Jessica, a CIA agent and best friend of Maya the main character, who the guards hesitatingly let through the checkpoints into the CIA black site simply because Jessica tells them to because now he's on their side. I think you can predict fairly well what happens at the end of this scene. Talk about a tense moment. Except for the fact that you could foresee it happening long before it does, and there are about a million "they would never have done that" moments involved. Anyway, as I was touching on before, there isn't really a very good connect-the-dots storyline of how they eventually get to UBL. They kinda just decide to try to find someone that no one wants to talk about regardless of how much they torture them and because he's acting kinda funny, like doing everything possible to not be tracked (a sure sign he's an important bad guy), and then the first moment they do find him, he just leads them right up to the compound by..... driving to it.
A lot of reviewers have commented about the use of torture in this movie and the movie-makers' stance on whether it was allowable or some say made even to look justifiable because it lead to finding Osama. I didn't much care for that aspect of the movie. Torture was bad. Osama was bad. I don't feel really strongly one way or the other about the fact that we got him. I'm really not a big "Yeah us!" proponent, so I didn't do any summersaults or anything when I heard that they killed him. I believe much more strongly that the anti-American sentiment throughout much of the rest of the world doesn't stem from terrorists and their inherent evilness as much as from our own foreign policy and the fact that corporate profits far and above anything else dictate national policy when it comes to oil-producing regions and the impoverished people that live there. But, the best review I came across of this movie was from an old classic movie reviewer, Roger Ebert (and he really went against the grain of what most other reviewers have been saying):
"The film's opening scenes are not great filmmaking. They're heavy on jargon and impenetrable calculation, murky and heavy on theory." He went on, "My guess is that much of the fascination with this film is inspired by the unveiling of facts, unclearly seen. There isn't a whole lot of plot – basically, just that Maya thinks she is right, and she is."He gives it three stars out of four. And I give it 4 stars out of five.
Friday, February 8, 2013
#36 — #38 Oscar Nominated Shorts: Documentary (Part I) (2012)
#36 Kings Point — Sari Gilman and Jedd Winer
#37 Mondays at Racine — Cynthia Wade and Robin Honan
#38 Inocente — Sean Fine and Andrea Nix Fine
#37 Mondays at Racine — Cynthia Wade and Robin Honan
#38 Inocente — Sean Fine and Andrea Nix Fine
Thursday, February 7, 2013
#28 — #35 Oscar Nominated Shorts: Animated (2012)
#28 Maggie Simpson in "The Longest Daycare" (2012) — David Silverman
#29 Adam and Dog (2011) — Minkyu Lee
#30 Fresh Guacamole (2012) — PES
#31 Head over Heels (2012) — Timothy Reckart and Fodhla Cronin O'Reilly
#32 Paperman (2012) — John Kahrs
Highly Commended:
#33 Abiogenesis (2011) — Richard Mans
#34 Dripped (2011) — Léo Verrier
#35 The Gruffalo's Child (2011) — Uwe Heidschötter and Johannes Weiland
#29 Adam and Dog (2011) — Minkyu Lee
#30 Fresh Guacamole (2012) — PES
#31 Head over Heels (2012) — Timothy Reckart and Fodhla Cronin O'Reilly
#32 Paperman (2012) — John Kahrs
Highly Commended:
#33 Abiogenesis (2011) — Richard Mans
#34 Dripped (2011) — Léo Verrier
#35 The Gruffalo's Child (2011) — Uwe Heidschötter and Johannes Weiland
Friday, February 1, 2013
Saturday, January 26, 2013
#20 Rashomon (1950)
Akira Kurosawa.
This is truly a classic in the history of film. This was the first time I have seen it, as I hadn't ever really gotten into Kurosawa despite knowing a little about his work (primarily Seven Samurai) and hearing his name mentioned as one of the top directors of all time.
Rashomon offers a great philosophical dilema. The movie begins with three men seeking shelter from the rain in a dilapidated building. The priest and woodcutter have just been witness to the trial of the notorious bandit Tajomaru and are retelling the tale. The story is quite simple. A samurai and his wife were traveling through the woods when confronted by Tajomaru. The woman is violated and her husband ends up dead. The dilema comes from the retelling of the story, as three different witnesses, the bandit, the wife and the dead husband (through a medium), all relay conflicting accounts of what occurred. Whose story is to be believed? How was the samurai killed? Why are there such drastic differences in the three versions of the same event? The final straw comes when the woodcutter reveals that he actually was present in the woods throughout the entire affair. When his account of the events offers a fourth version, we are struck with the complexity of what should be a simple straight-forward crime story. The earnestness of the woodcutter, along with the fact that the whole story of the trial is coming from him (with the priest as a corroborator), makes it difficult to question the validity of his account. However, when it is revealed that he hasn't been entirely truthful about every detail, a whole array of larger questions arise about perception, subjectivity, partiality, point-of-view and memory. I can clearly understand why this movie is considered a classic. And, I also wonder why today's movie-making industry doesn't generate many films that invoke mental contemplation from its viewers. Is film losing its place as an artform and becoming solely a commodity?
Sunday, January 20, 2013
#14 Django Unchained (2012)
Quentin Tarantino.
Definitely the best Tarantino movie I've seen in just about 18 years. Yes, I rank this one above Inglorious Basterds. Jaime Foxx plays Django Freeman the best bad-ass since Jules Winnfield. The return of Samuel Jackson to a Tarantino movie was another great highlight. DiCaprio is very good. Christoph Waltz is excellent. The story is well-written and the soundtrack is awesome. At numerous points in the movie, Tarantino's control over the tension between slave-owner and former slave, overseer and free man, slave and black slaver highlighted with the right music at just the right time made me feel shivers down my back. A feeling I hadn't had in a movie for a long time. There are too many good things about this movie to write about. 5 stars.
Saturday, January 19, 2013
#12 Silver Linings Playbook (2012)
Directed by David O. Russell.
When some friends suggested we make an effort to see all the oscar-nominated films for this year's oscars, I thought it was an interesting idea and kind of opportune since I'm doing this almost365films thing (although I just realized it means I have to see Life of Pi). Since my parents were in town and we all wanted to go to a movie, we chose one that would be appealing to all the members of the family and went to the theater to see Silver Linings Playbook.
I didn't hate it.
I kind of enjoyed it at times. So I guess its gimmick is that it's not your typical rom-com because it also deals with deeper issues like mental health, recovery, etc. What it's gimmick really seemed to be was everyone yelling at each other a lot. My wife (who is not American) was fairly confused by this movie. The recurring adjective she kept using for it was "bizarre." I guess that we Americans understand and even enjoy people yelling at each other all the time. Especially if it's about football, bets or some competition of some sort. Or as a way of flirting. I guess America is addicted to dance competitions also, so that got worked into it. Charming. When we spoke about it with the friends with whom we are going to do this "see all the oscar-nominated films" project, we brought up that since it was nominated for best picture we were thinking it might have been something other than a typical romantic American, happy-ending, the team wins, our savings didn't get lost in the bet by a tenth of a point, the guy chases after the girl to tell her he loves her climactic-type movie. But as Bob put it, "Man, what the hell were you expecting when you have Robert De Niro acting like an idiot and the guy from the Hangover part 3?"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







































